←back to Blog

Short-Term Clinical Comparison of Scapular Stabilization With and Without Added Kinetic-Chain Exercises on Pain, Scapular Kinematics, and Upper-Extremity Function in Overhead Athletes With Subacromial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Physiother Res Int. 2026 Oct;31(4):e70346. doi: 10.1002/pri.70346.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Scapular stabilization exercises are commonly used in the rehabilitation of athletes with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) and scapular dyskinesis. Whether supplementing scapular stabilization with kinetic-chain exercises provides greater short-term benefits remains uncertain. This study compared the short-term effects of a scapular stabilization program alone with those of the same program supplemented with additional kinetic-chain exercises.

METHODS: Twenty-four overhead athletes with SAPS and scapular dyskinesis were randomly assigned to a scapular stabilization group (n = 12) or a kinetic-chain-supplemented group (n = 12). Both groups performed the same standardized scapular stabilization program; the latter also performed additional trunk, lower-extremity, balance, and multisegment exercises, resulting in a greater overall exercise stimulus. Outcomes were assessed before and after 4 weeks. The prespecified primary outcome was scapular upward rotation at 90° shoulder elevation. Between-group differences were analyzed using two-way mixed repeated-measures ANOVA, with the group × time interaction as the principal test, and reported with 95% confidence intervals. Holm-Bonferroni adjustment and baseline-adjusted ANCOVA were conducted as sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS: For the prespecified primary outcome, scapular upward rotation at 90°, the group × time interaction was not statistically significant (p = 0.052; ηp2 = 0.161), with a between-group difference in change of -4.38° (95% CI, -8.80° to 0.03°). After Holm-Bonferroni adjustment for the 15 group × time comparisons, the primary outcome remained nonsignificant (adjusted p = 0.723). The baseline-adjusted ANCOVA also showed no statistically significant between-group difference (-3.51°, 95% CI, -7.33° to 0.31°; p = 0.070); however, the significant group × baseline interaction (p = 0.002) indicated that the homogeneity-of-regression-slopes assumption was not met. An unadjusted significant group × time interaction was observed for scapular upward rotation at 45° (p = 0.028), but this finding did not remain significant after Holm-Bonferroni adjustment (adjusted p = 0.426). No other group × time interaction remained statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons.

CONCLUSION: Both rehabilitation programs were associated with short-term improvements in patient-reported outcomes. However, adding kinetic-chain exercises did not result in a clear additional short-term benefit compared with scapular stabilization alone. Because the kinetic-chain group also completed more exercises overall, the specific contribution of the kinetic-chain component cannot be determined. Given the small sample size and uncertainty surrounding the primary outcome, smaller but potentially meaningful differences between the programs cannot be excluded.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT20240614062130N1, registered July 20, 2024.

PMID:42775581 | DOI:10.1002/pri.70346