Nat Commun. 2025 Sep 24;16(1):8358. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61817-8.
ABSTRACT
EGFRex20 insertions (EGFRex20ins) can be classified as near- and far-loop based on the insertion location, however, the impact of location on responses to various EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is poorly understood. In vitro studies show that afatinib, poziotinib, and zipalertinib more potently inhibited near-loop than far-loop insertions, whereas mobocertinib has similar IC50 in both groups. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal that near-loop insertions have multiple conformational states and lower transitional energy than far-loop insertions. ZENITH20 trial cohort 1 (NCT03318939) evaluates poziotinib in EGFRex20 NSCLC patients (n = 115) and demonstrates an objective response rate of 14.8% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 8.9 to 22.6, primary endpoint of the trial). Although the study’s primary efficacy endpoint was not met in the overall cohort, the exploratory analysis indicates poziotinib has superior benefit in EGFRex20 near- versus far-insertions showing greater mean tumor size reduction (-25.9% vs. -9.8%, p = 0.0014) and progression-free survival (PFS, 11.1 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.016). In comparison, in the previously published EXCLAIM trial (NCT02716116), mobocertinib demonstrates similar activities across both groups in tumor size reduction (-38.5% vs. -34.1%, p = 0.59) and PFS (12.0 vs. 13.0 months, p = 0.99). Therefore, EGFRex20ins location differentially impacts the sensitivity of TKIs.
PMID:40993146 | DOI:10.1038/s41467-025-61817-8
