BMJ Glob Health. 2026 May 11;11(5):e019902. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019902.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Timely and appropriate diagnosis and treatment are key to ending tuberculosis (TB). Incorporating users’ preferences when implementing decentralised strategies for diagnosis may facilitate scale-up and impact. This qualitative study embedded within a cluster randomised controlled trial explored the values and preferences of multiple stakeholders regarding a TB diagnostic strategy using the Truenat platform, mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) Plus and rifampicin Dx Assays in Mozambique and Tanzania.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with people with presumptive TB (n=35), professional users (laboratory technicians, nurses, clinicians, n=19) and national decision-makers (n=5). Direct observations of testing procedures and usability surveys (n=12) were also conducted. Thematic analysis was performed, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
RESULTS: Facilities varied in testing capacity, number of cases and time-to-results (from same-day to >2 weeks). Availability and supply of reagents and cartridges were described as an issue by healthcare providers and a potential cause for delayed results. The Truenat platform for detection of TB was considered easy to use (median SUS score 90/100) as well as acceptable and fit to the context where the evaluation was conducted. Truenat’s advantage was appreciated in facilities with limited prior testing capacity (eg, shipping samples, using microscopy), including short time-to-results, reduced need to return to provide more samples and fewer infrastructure needs (compared with GeneXpert). People with presumptive TB preferred the same-day results and rapid initiation of treatment enabled by Truenat testing. Some viewed waiting longer time (>1 day) for the results acceptable if it were to result in increased accuracy. Regarding the diagnostic process, participants valued the support and counselling from the healthcare workers.
CONCLUSIONS: The Truenat platform and TB assays were perceived as easy to use by health providers, and as acceptable and feasible across stakeholder groups. Its implementation in decentralised settings was considered a preferred alternative to off-site Xpert testing for TB in Mozambique and Tanzania.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04568954.
PMID:42114928 | DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019902
