←back to Blog

Model Context Protocol (MCP) vs Function Calling vs OpenAPI Tools — When to Use Each?

«`html

Model Context Protocol (MCP) vs Function Calling vs OpenAPI Tools — When to Use Each?

In the evolving landscape of AI and business management, understanding the distinctions between Model Context Protocol (MCP), Function Calling, and OpenAPI Tools is crucial for organizations seeking to optimize their integration strategies. This article aims to clarify when to use each approach based on their unique strengths, limitations, and use cases.

Target Audience Analysis

The target audience for this content includes:

  • Business Managers: Seeking efficient integration solutions for AI tools within their organizations.
  • Technical Decision Makers: Evaluating the best protocols for tool integration and orchestration.
  • Developers: Interested in implementing AI solutions with a focus on performance and scalability.

Common pain points include:

  • Difficulty in selecting the right integration method for specific use cases.
  • Concerns about security and governance in tool integration.
  • Need for portability across different platforms and environments.

Goals include:

  • Streamlining AI tool integrations to enhance productivity.
  • Ensuring compliance with security standards and governance policies.
  • Maximizing the effectiveness of AI solutions across various business functions.

Communication preferences lean towards clear, concise, and technical language that provides actionable insights.

Comparison Table

Concern MCP Function Calling OpenAPI Tools
Interface contract Protocol data model (tools/resources/prompts) Per-function JSON Schema OAS 3.1 document
Discovery Dynamic via tools/list Static list provided to the model From OAS; catalogable
Invocation tools/call over JSON-RPC session Model selects function; app executes HTTP request per OAS op
Orchestration Host routes across many servers/tools App-local chaining Agent/toolkit routes intents → operations
Transport stdio / HTTP variants In-band via LLM API HTTP(S) to services
Portability Cross-host/server Vendor-specific surface Vendor-neutral contracts

Strengths and Limits

MCP

Strengths: Standardized discovery; reusable servers; multi-tool orchestration; growing host support (e.g., Semantic Kernel, Cursor; Windows integration plans).

Limits: Requires running servers and host policy (identity, consent, sandboxing). Host must implement session lifecycle and routing.

Function Calling

Strengths: Lowest integration overhead; fast control loop; straightforward validation via JSON Schema.

Limits: App-local catalogs; portability requires redefinition per vendor; limited built-in discovery/governance.

OpenAPI Tools

Strengths: Mature contracts; security schemes (OAuth2, keys) in-spec; rich tooling (agents from OAS).

Limits: OAS defines HTTP contracts, not agentic control loops—you still need an orchestrator/host.

Security and Governance

MCP: Enforces host policy (allowed servers, user consent), per-tool scopes, and ephemeral credentials. Platform adoption (e.g., Windows) emphasizes registry control and consent prompts.

Function Calling: Validates model-produced arguments against schemas; maintains allowlists; logs calls for audit.

OpenAPI Tools: Utilizes OAS security schemes, gateways, and schema-driven validation; constrains toolkits that allow arbitrary requests.

Ecosystem Signals (Portability/Adoption)

MCP hosts/servers: Supported in Microsoft Semantic Kernel (host + server roles) and Cursor (MCP directory, IDE integration); Microsoft signaled Windows-level support.

Function Calling: Broadly available across major LLM APIs (OpenAI docs shown here) with similar patterns (schema, selection, tool results).

OpenAPI Tools: Multiple agent stacks auto-generate tools from OAS (LangChain Python/JS).

Decision Rules (When to Use Which)

Use Function Calling for app-local automations with a handful of actions and tight latency targets. Keep definitions small, validate strictly, and unit-test the loop.

Choose MCP for cross-runtime portability and shared integrations (agents, IDEs, desktops, backends). It provides standardized discovery and invocation across hosts, allowing for server reuse across products.

Opt for OpenAPI Tools in enterprise estates of HTTP services needing contracts, security schemes, and governance. Use OAS as the source of truth; generate tools, and enforce gateways.

A common hybrid pattern is to keep OAS for your services; expose them via an MCP server for portability, or mount a subset as function calls for latency-critical product surfaces.

References

«`