Eur J Neurol. 2025 Aug;32(8):e70208. doi: 10.1111/ene.70208.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of adding ultra-early and short-term administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to standard care in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An economic evaluation was performed alongside the ultra-early tranexamic acid after subarachnoid hemorrhage (ULTRA) trial. The main outcomes were the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as costs per one-point increase in modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR), expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) were visualized with varying ICER cut-offs. Bootstrapping techniques and sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainty.
RESULTS: The ULTRA trial included 955 patients, with 480 assigned to the TXA group and 475 to the control group. The mean mRS score was 3.4 (95% CI: 3.2-3.5) in the TXA group and 3.2 (95% CI: 3.0-3.4) in the control group. The mean QALY was 0.26 (95% CI: 0.24-0.28) in the TXA group and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.26-0.30) in the control group. Mean costs were €62,180 (95% CI: 57,589-66,913) in the TXA group and €58,624 (95% CI: 53,693-63,955) in the control group. The probability of treatment with TXA being cost-effective ranged from 4% to 16% for mRS and from 8% to 16% for QALYs.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultra-early and short-term administration of TXA to patients with SAH is not cost-effective. Therefore, we recommend against using TXA for this patient group.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register: NTR3272.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT02684812.
PMID:40843772 | DOI:10.1111/ene.70208
