Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Dec 28;49(12):1919-1926. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240310.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Pelvic floor sensory training is commonly used in clinical practice for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI); however, there is a lack of comparative studies evaluating pelvic floor sensation between women with SUI and healthy controls. Additionally, normative data for two-point discrimination thresholds in the female pelvic floor region remain scarce. This study aims to compare the results of 4 sensory tests in the pelvic floor region between women with mild SUI and healthy women, in order to provide reference values for two-point discrimination thresholds in this area.
METHODS: From April 1 to October 30, 2023, 108 healthy women [(32.5±3.6) years] and 90 women with mild SUI [(32.9±3.3) years] were recruited from the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Participants underwent 4 sensory tests in the pelvic floor region: Two-dot discrimination, weight perception, shape recognition, and 9-grid localization. The results were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: Compared with healthy women, those with mild SUI had lower sensitivity and higher thresholds in 2-dot discrimination tests in the pelvic floor region (all P<0.001). No significant differences were found between groups in weight perception, shape recognition, or grid localization tests (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with mild stress urinary incontinence have impaired two-point discrimination ability in the pelvic floor region.
PMID:40195664 | DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240310
