←back to Blog

Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in terms of symptoms and clinical and electrophysiological findings: a randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial

Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Sep 27;39(1):243. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04189-7.

ABSTRACT

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is the second most common entrapment neuropathy and presents with symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, and weakness in the elbow. Provocative tests and electrophysiological examinations are helpful in the diagnosis of UNE. Low-level laser therapy is one of the conservative treatments of UNE however, limited results were reported on the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the treatment of UNE. In our study, we aimed to the efficacy of LLLT in reducing symptoms and providing clinical and electrophysiological improvement in patients with UNE. This study with a randomized-sham controlled, and double-blind design included 68 patients aged 18-60 years who were diagnosed with UNE. LLLT was applied to the first group, and sham laser was applied to the second group. The VAS pain, paresthesia, and weakness scores, grip strength, and provocative test positivity were evaluated in clinical examination. The QuickDASH questionnaire was administered to assess functional status. Electrophysiologically, motor distal latency (MDL) differences, sensory distal latency (SDL), motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity (NCV) were examined. Evaluations were performed before treatment and on the 15th day and at the third month after treatment. The LLLT group showed improvement in symptoms, clinical findings, motor NCV, and MDL at both post-treatment evaluations and sensory NCV on the post-treatment 15th day (p < 0.05). The comparison of post-treatment changes between the two groups revealed that the LLLT group had greater improvement in VAS day and night pain scores at both post-treatment evaluation times, QuickDASH scores at the third month, and sensory NCV on the 15th day (p < 0.05) compared to the SL group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the post-treatment changes in VAS weakness scores, grip strength and electrophysiological findings (p > 0.05). It was observed that splinting alone was effective in UNE, but the addition of LLLT, one of the conservative treatment methods, enhanced treatment outcomes.

PMID:39327309 | DOI:10.1007/s10103-024-04189-7